The graph shows the population of european cities between 100 ce and 1000 ce. what does the graph indicate about the change in urban populations during this time?

I would go with B, "populations declined in urban areas"

Explanation:

For all 3, the urban population is much greater in 100 CE than 1000 CE. I find the graphs to be set up in a poor way and you'd expect them to have grown, so forgive me if I'm wrong.

Populations decline in urban areas

Explanation:

As you can see in the graph over the course of those 9 centuries the population decline, in different measurements in the three metropolis that we are seeing in Rome, the population became almost 1/20 of that of the first cenury compared with the population of 10 centuries after that, in other areas, like london and paris the declining of the population was less drastic but still observed a decline on urban population.

10 states did

~courtney

australian plates collided into eurasian plates, and the himalayas formed. the andes mountain range the himalayas and the islands of japan form differently. the andes mountain range formed at the convergent boundary of an oceanic plate and continental plate.