What conclusion about the use of u. s. military power would be most logically drawn from the experience of the lraq war ?

The correct answer is D) The support of the American people is not necessary for military victory.

The other options of the question were A) After a military victory, the defeated country may remain unstable and dangerous. B) A stronger military does not guarantee victory. C) The superiority of American weapons is the most important factor in military conflicts.

The conclusion about the use of U.S. military power that would be most logically drawn from the experience of the Iraq War was "The support of the American people is not necessary for military victory."

The Bush administration wanted to overthrow Sadam Hussein as the leader of Iraq. That is why, with the support of Great Britain and other countries, the United States Army invaded Iraq in 2003. The excuse was that Hussein was fabricating weapons of mass destruction but the Security Council of the United Nations never confirmed this information. So without the Council's approval, George W. Bush decided to invade Iraq. Many people in the United States and all over the world did not support this military action.

based on this information, i would advocate against sweatshop labour because it exploits workers in unsafe working conditions with little pay. though sweatshops produce inexpensive goods, they harm the environment, workers, and often use unsafe materials to make consumer goods.