How could anyone continue eating meat after learning about how the animals are treated? what makes this a weak claim for an argumentative research paper

It has no arguments supporting it.

Explanation:

Eventhoug it is a claim and has a statement about how people can continue eating meat after knowing how animals are treated, the important thing is to support the claim with facts and create arguments, this could be better expressed with: "Why does people are indifferent to animal suffering on meat farms?" so you can present the attrocities that animals live and how people are indifferent towards their suffering.

was a long, primarily nonviolent series of events to bring full civil rights and equality under the law to all americans. the era has had a lasting impact on united states society, in its tactics, the increased social and legal acceptance of civil rights, and in its exposure of the prevalence and cost of racism. in the south violence and fraud in southern elections from 1868 to 1876, which had reduced black voter turnout and enabled southern white democrats to regain power in state legislatures across the south

southern north america: yucatán peninsula in southern mexico extending into northern guatemala, and northern belize. these moist forests on the yucatán peninsula of south-eastern mexico are characterized by a tropical humid climate with little topographic relief.

explanation: