While reading two articles on the cia’s functions, you discover that both articles have similar opinions and facts, but the first article’s author is a reporter and the second article’s author is a former cia employee. which article would be more relevant to your research?

Explanation:

The second article is more important to the research, because its author is a former CIA employee, this means that it's primary resource to the research, it's written in first person by an employee directly. So, because of this, the second articles is way more reliable, than the first one which author is a reporter only.

the fundamental orders of connecticut it would be the letter b

because they had ajdjdjdjdndjjs