Which statement best explains why the "divine right of kings" theory conflicted with the idea of a social contract? a. the divine right of kings theory bound people to a religion, which, according to rousseau and locke, went against natural law. b. social contracts required the consent of every individual in society, which meant kings had to obey the will of the majority. c. because divine right of kings awarded absolute power to monarchs as leaders of society, there could not be a true consent of the people. d. as a purely catholic idea, the divine right of kings theory conflicted with the protestant theory of a social contract.

answer:

the answer is a

explanation:

its a because it all revolves around religion.

i think it would be a

overtime, the civil rights movement changed in a way that not only it benefited african-americans, but benefited other ethnicity's such as latinos, asians, or women too! that's why the results of the movement be called mixed.

the civil rights movement brought about tremendous changes. no longer were blacks denied the right to vote, to eat, shop, and swim where they , and more importantly, to attend integrated schools. despite its many accomplishments, however, the civil rights movement had its shortcomings. for example, many people, both young and old, lost their lives, homes, jobs, and families. still other individuals were so damaged by psychological trauma that they ceased being productive members of the community. the movement left intact the economic inequities that had contributed to the maintenance of segregation. and finally, racism remained alive and well long after the movement's end. like most movements of its kind, the civil rights movement left behind a mixed legacy of triumph and tragedy.