What role did the united states play in yom kippur/ramadan war

The United States supported Israel in this conflict.

Due to this support, the United States and the Soviet Union were on a brink of a near-confrontation, the first since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.

The Yom Kippur War, also called the Ramadan War, was a war fought from October 6th to 25th, 1973, between a coalition of Arab states led by Egypt and Syria against Israel.

The Arab coalition launched a surprise attack on Israel during the day of Yom Kippur, the holiest day in Judaism and during the month of Ramadan.

Israel was aided by massive U.S. military assistance and it seized the strategically important Golan Heights.

The Soviets backed down in the end but the relationship between them and the United States became farther damaged.

separation of powers, therefore, refers to the division of government responsibilities into distinct branches to limit any one branch from exercising the core functions of another.   the intent is to prevent the concentration of power and provide for checks and balances.  

the traditional characterizations of the powers of the branches of american government are:

* the legislative branch is responsible for enacting the laws of the state and appropriating the money necessary to operate the government.

* the executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering the public policy enacted and funded by the legislative branch.

* the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the constitution and laws and applying their interpretations to controversies brought before it.

forty state constitutions specify that government be divided into three branches:   legislative, executive and judicial.   california illustrates this approach; "the powers of state government are legislative, executive, and judicial.   persons charged with the exercise of one power may not exercise either of the others except as permitted by this constitution."

while separation of powers is key to the workings of american government, no democratic system exists with an absolute separation of powers or an absolute lack of separation of powers. governmental powers and responsibilities intentionally overlap; they are too complex and interrelated to be neatly compartmentalized. as a result, there is an inherent measure of competition and conflict

minnesota:   minnesota house research,   separation of powers: when statutes and court rules conflict, 2005