Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

a. to view a collection of different opinions on the event
b. to provide a scholarly perspective on the event
c. to evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event
d. to find out how people currently remember the event

c) To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event

hope this helps!

answer: choose the second bullet point. it is the easiest to put together an answer to the question.

explanation:

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3