Why did six u. s. senators sue the federal government seeking to prevent president clinton and all future presidents from using the line-item veto?
a) the senators were opposed to passage of the line-item veto act on the grounds that it was unconstitutional.
b) the u. s. supreme court had recently ruled that only the president is allowed to exercise a pocket veto and they sought to have that overturned.
c) the senators strongly supported the provisions of the balanced budget act that clinton struck out using the line-item veto.
d) the senators felt that clinton should only use a regular veto when rejecting a bill.

The correct answer is "A".

A line-item veto is a form of veto that enables the President of the United States to reject certain provisions of a bill which has reached his instance. However, this veto does not reject the entire bill.

During 1994, Republican senators, which at the time were the majority, were intending to pass certain legislation aligned to their "Contract with America" proposals. However, President Clinton made use of the line-item veto in order to hinder many of these efforts. This caused Republican Senators to decided to initiate a lawsuit in order to prevent the line-item veto.

The Supreme Court would eventually rule in favor of the senators, arguing the line-item veto Act of 1996 violated the United States Constitution because it gave the President the power to unilaterally amend parts of bills which had passed through the entire legislative process.

the answer is expolration. hope this !

while it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton.

explanation:

before eli whitney's invention of the cotton gin, picking and cleaning cotton was a slow, labor-intensive job. workers, usually slaves, had to pick the seeds from the cotton fibers by hand. this invention made it possible to grow large amounts of cotton on big farms and make money.