Why do you think that the scholarly community did not believe anna kjellström's conclusion that the skeleton was a woman?

The scholarly community did not believe Anna's conclusion that the skeleton was a woman since this kind of incidence was unheard of. In most cases when the term warrior was mentioned most people visualized a man. Archaeologists, on the other hand, defined gender roles and viewed men as wielders of violence unlike women .Therefore until they had evidence that a woman could be a Viking warrior, it remained hard to believe that the skeleton was a woman.

the answer should be:

their party has more members.

if i am right, give me a 5 star rating!

frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. but frederick disliked rifle shooting and horseback riding. unlike his father, he was interested in french literature. he enjoyed poetry and music and, like some others of the enlightenment, he scoffed at religion. his father thought him soft, frivolous and unmindful of his duties. and when frederick refused to put his signature on a right to succession, for a few moments his father strangled him.