Why do you think that the scholarly community did not believe anna kjellström's conclusion that the skeleton was a woman?

The scholarly community did not believe Anna's conclusion that the skeleton was a woman since this kind of incidence was unheard of. In most cases when the term warrior was mentioned most people visualized a man. Archaeologists, on the other hand, defined gender roles and viewed men as wielders of violence unlike women .Therefore until they had evidence that a woman could be a Viking warrior, it remained hard to believe that the skeleton was a woman.

in 1803 the louisiana purchase took place, doubling the size of the country. by 1840 almost 7 million americans had migrated westward in hopes of securing land and being prosperous. the belief that settlers were destined to expand to the west is often referred to as manifest destiny.

explanation:

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: