Why did united starr’s fail to join the league of nations? a-great britain and france would not allow the united states to join the organization. b-woodrow wilson and his opponents refused to compromise on the wording of the treaty of versailles. c-americans preferred to join a military alliance with britain instead. d-senator henry cabot lodge failed to persuade enough senators that the league would benefit the united states?
11 answer : spain
12 answer : france
13answer: the treaty of versailles
14 : "cash-and-carry" / neutrality act of 1939
15: answer the vietnam war affected the attitude of americans toward future conflicts around the world in that americans have been "less" willing to intervene inthe affairs of other countries, since the vietnam war has widely been viewed as a major mistake.
Explanation: The senate did not like how they thought they would be required to join wars of Europe
The United States failed to join the Leage of Nations because Woodrow Wilson and his opponents refused to compromise on the wording of The Treaty of Versailles.
For Woodrow Wilson, the League of Nations was the best chance for long-term peace after the horrors of WWI. However, the Senate did not support the US joining the League of Nations. The said League of Nations was based on the Treaty of Versailles, which was not signed by the US since the government was not convinced by the conditions. The Senate refused to ratify the treaty that Woodrow Wilson had helped write and did not join the League of Nations.
Woodrow Wilson and his opponents refused to compromise on the wording of the Treaty of Versailles.
One of the most important weaknesses of the League of Nations was the fact that many countries never joined, with the notable example of the United States. Although President Woodrow Wilson had been instrumental in the establishment of the League, him and his opponents refused to compromise on the wording of the Treaty of Versailles. It is hard to say whether the inclusion of the United States in the League would have made any significant difference in terms of its success.