Read the sentence below and answer the question that follows. clowning, which originated at birthday parties, have transformed the lives of many kids. how should the sentence above be rewritten to correct the subject-verb agreement error? the sentence is correct as written. clowning, which originated at birthday parties, do transform the lives of many kids. clowning, which originated at birthday parties, has transformed the lives of many kids. clowning, which originated at birthday parties, are transforming the lives of many kids.

Answer by YourHope:

Hi! :)

Read the sentence below and answer the question that follows.

Clowning, which originated at birthday parties, have transformed the lives of many kids.

How should the sentence above be rewritten to correct the subject-verb agreement error?

B) Clowning, which originated at birthday parties, has transformed the lives of many kids!

Have a BEAUTIFUL day~

The correct answer is C. Clowning, which originated at birthday parties, has transformed the lives of many kids.

Explanation:

In grammar, a subject-verb agreement error occurs when the subject that is the agent that performs the action and the verb that is the main action of a sentence does not agree in number which means a singular subject is combined with a plural verb form or vice-versa. In the case of the sentence "Clowning, which originated at birthday parties, have transformed the lives of many kids" this contains a subject-verb agreement error because the subject "clowning" is singular but the verb from "have transformed" is plural and therefore the verb form needs to be changed to "has transformed" which is used with singular nouns. This means the sentence that corrects the subject-verb agreement error is "Clowning, which originated at birthday parties, has transformed the lives of many kids" as this makes the verb singular but also preserves the original form of the sentence.

the war powers resolution (also known as the war powers resolution of 1973 or the war powers act) (50 u.s.c. 1541–1548) is a federal law intended to check the president's power to commit the united states to an armed conflict without the consent of the u.s. congress.

explanation:

hi there!

question - in the 1900s there were two competing views about the environment that often pitted industrialist and conservationist against one another. how were these two competing views demonstrated by the environmental policies of president roosevelt and president taft?

hope this : )