What is the significance of the us supreme court opinion that words creating a clear and present danger are not protected by the first amendment a. the constitution limits individual rights b. the constitution safeguards individual rights c. the constitution does not limit individual rights d. the constitution does not safeguard individual rights cer - claim, evidence, reasoning!

The correct answer is A. The Constitution limits individual rights

The Clear and Present Danger was a ruling by the US Supreme Court that started with the case Schenck v. the United States in 1919. The court stated that the freedom of speech is not an absolute right, there are times that the government can restrict speech legally, this happens when words are used to create clear and present danger such as wartime.

the answer is A

Explanation:

the correct answer is a) he thought the government’s military action was a mistake.

the whiskey rebellion was a tax protest in the us that started in 1791 and ended in 1974. it has this name because the whiskey tax was the first tax that was imposed on a domestic product by the new federal government.

jefferson was against the government’s military action because he believed that the purpose of the government was to protect the unalienable rights of its citizens and that these rights include life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and he thought that people had the constitutional right to rebel. he has said: “the first error was to pass it (the whiskey tax); the second was to enforce it; and the third, to make it the means of splitting this union.”

i really hope this answer you out! it makes my day people like you and giving back to the community that has me through school! if you could do me a favor, if this you and this is the very best answer and you understand that all of my answers are legit and top notch. mark as brainliest! and have a awesome day!