How did the emancipation proclamation change the meaning of the civil war? by freeing southern troops from their military commitments so they could return home by eliminating slavery in the confederate states by securing voting rights for black property holders in both the north and south by eliminating slavery in new states and territories

Question: How did the Emancipation Proclamation change the meaning of the Civil War?

Options:

The correct answer is: By eliminating slavery in the Confederate states.

Explanation: President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1st, 1863, as the third year of bloody civil war was approaching. In his speech, he explained that this proclamation declared "all persons held as slaves (within the rebellious states) are, and henceforward shall be free." It took the enactment of the 13th Amendment to make it the law of the land.

The rebellious states were known as the confederate states. These states were a collection of 11 states that seceded from the United States in 1860 following the election of President Abraham Lincoln. They existed from 1861 to 1865 and were led by Jefferson Davis.  

By creating the Emancipation Proclamation, he was freeing slaves in the Confederacy which meant Lincoln was actually freeing people he did not directly control. The Emancipation Proclamation did not end slavery in the nation but it captured the hearts of millions of Americans and fundamentally transformed the character of the war. The war was no longer focused on just preserving the Union but it was also about freeing the slaves.  This means it wasn’t a turning point materially so much as it was morally.

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.