The supreme court's ruling in the case of marbury v. madison (1803) mculloh v maryland (1819) and gibbons v ogden (1824) are simiar in that each resulted in the

The correct answer is that each case resulted in the Federal government getting more power, in one way or another.

In Marbury v. Madison, the Judicial Branch elbowed its way into establishing the ability to review laws to determine their constitutionality.

In McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress got more power when the Supreme Court ruled that it had implied powers.

In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that states can't get in the way of Congress acting in their role of arbiter of interstate commerce.

president carter called the victims of kidnapping "victims of terrorism and anarchy" and added that the united states was not going to give in to blackmail. in the united states, they see hostage-taking as an outrage on the part of the islamist movement that violated the principle of international law on the immunity and inviolability of diplomats and their embassies.

carter refused to yield to the demands, khomeini used the situation to consolidate his power and nullify the challenges of the moderate wing of his government, headed by its president. the euphoria over the humiliation of the most powerful nation distracted the iranian people from the economic difficulties of their country. carter, in april 1980, broke diplomatic relations with iran and imposed a trade embargo, except medicine and food. iranian funds in the us they were frozen and accounted for to compensate the hostages when they were released and to pay the demands of us companies against iran.