When a historical record is not dated, which two methods might historians use to check its authenticity? choose 2 they try to determine whether it was created for temporary or permanent use. they try to determine the audience for whom the record was meant. they use scientific methods such as radiocarbon dating. they make an assumption. they compare it to other historical sources.

When a historical record is not dated, the two methods that historians might use to check its authenticity are the following:

This is because by using radiocarbon historians can determine the age in which a particular historical account occurred through an object that has organic material.

Also, by comparing specific historical records to other historical sources, historians would be able to see a correlation in their occurrence and then use the date from other sources to determine the day of the one that is unknown.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option C. "They use scientific methods such as radiocarbon dating., and option E. They compare it to other historical sources."

Learn more here: link

They use scientific methods such as radiocarbon dating.

They compare it to other historical sources.

Explanation:

These are two of the ways in which historians might check the authenticity of a historical record that is not dated. When a document lacks a date, it is difficukt to establish the significance of it, the purpose and even the authenticity of the work. However, through radiocarbon dating, historians can approximate the age of the work. Another strategy is comparing it to other historical sources, as this would allow the historian to place it in a wider context.

i think its the outcome of people's preferences.

i believe your answer is d)