True or false a biography of king charles is a secondary source

A biography of King Charles would be a secondary source, since it gathers and presents information that was originally presented somewhere else. Primary sources present information in a relatively unfiltered state; they are less removed from the facts on the ground. Secondary sources, on the other hand, involve some level of generalisation or analysis, or some sort of interpretation of those facts. A biography would entail the study of primary sources (letters, chronicles, testimonies and other documents from the era) which, after being analized, would yield the information that is presented in the biography.

the answer is true hope you have a nice day and hope this helps

your answer will be b. improving roads, bridges, and other infrastructure. hope i !

when world war i broke out across europe in 1914, president woodrow wilson proclaimed the united states would remain neutral, and many americans supported this policy of nonintervention. however, public opinion about neutrality started to change after the sinking of the british ocean liner lusitania by a german u-boat in 1915; almost 2,000 people perished, including 128 americans. along with news of the zimmerman telegram threatening an alliance between germany and mexico, wilson asked congress for a declaration of war against germany. the u.s. officially entered the conflict on april 6, 1917.