What legacy was established after the holocaust for nations to deal with genocide?

There are likely two answers to this. We have to cover 2 situations. In 1948 the United Nations adopted a resolution that all members (at that time) agreed to. The resolution said that all perpetrators of a genocide were to be punished. That covered members of the United Nations, but genocides have been committed since world WWII by nations other than those belonging to the UN.

How are those cases being handled and how well is the UN resolution obeyed.

When you look this question up, many more countries have agreed with the resolution, but still disobeyed its intent. China being one. Believe it or not, the US was accused of being another. There were others like Rwanda that really were guilty of Genocide who agreed with the policy but were not among the original ratifiers.

detente translated to english means politics

question: write a report analyzing through articles of confederation.

answer: the articles of confederation the united states constitution was written when the people feared strong government the new nation needed some kind of organization to hold states together to them fend off future attacks and make a stronger support system through the states and people the states bonded through a friendship that best served as a defense against a invasion and states were not allowed to use taxes as a way to discourage treaties, and states were extremely limited in their dealings with foreign nations the strengths were that the congress has the highest power in the nation because of   fear of monarchy congress had the sole power to declare war and assign treaties disputes between states and territorial issues were to be brought to congress and weaknesses were the lack of power given to congress the articles gave congress the power to pass laws but no power to enforce those laws if a state did not support a federal law that state could simply ignore it congress had no power to levy taxes or regulate trade.

explanation: so like every argument they have strengths and weaknesses but in this case there were more weaknesses but they managed o get through it and make an agreement

question answered by

(jacemorris04)