How different is the practice of anthropology in the 19th century with the 21st century

The practice of Anthropology in the 19th century is different from the 21st century. due to the following reasons.

We conclude that Anthropology is a very important subject that allows humans to understand their past in order to change their present and improve the future of humans in our societies, facing different challenges.

Learn more about this topic here:

link

There are several ways in which the field of anthropology has evolved from the way it was practiced during the 19th century. However, I will discuss two factors that are particularly significant:

The first one is the fact that anthropology has expanded. In the 19th century, this category was only present in a few universities, and it generally included a small number of subjects and approaches. Anthropology nowadays has grown in popularity and complexity, particularly because of the presence of interdisciplinary approaches.

A second way in which anthropology has changed is by its less ethnocentric approach. At its origins, anthropology tended to judge other countries from a "Western" standard. However, this is much less common nowadays, as anthropologists try to implement cultural relativism.

in 1897, pershing became a tactical officer at west point, and that's where he was given the nickname "black jack." pershing's first name is "john," for which "jack" is a nickname, and he was a white man who commanded black troops. hence "black jack".

frederick william of brandenburg-prussia trained his son, frederick, to be a hardy soldier. but frederick disliked rifle shooting and horseback riding. unlike his father, he was interested in french literature. he enjoyed poetry and music and, like some others of the enlightenment, he scoffed at religion. his father thought him soft, frivolous and unmindful of his duties. and when frederick refused to put his signature on a right to succession, for a few moments his father strangled him.