Following the pullman strike, how did the supreme court rule in the case of in re debs a. the government had the authority to end labor strikes. b. the government had the authority to negotiate with labor unions. c. the government had the authority to suspend railroad traffic. d. the government had the authority to imprison strike breakers.

The correct answer is A.

The “Pullman attack” was an attack in the United States throughout the country. It began on May 11, 1894 and ended on July 20 of the same year.

The strike began in Pullman on May 11, where more than 4,000 workers from the Pullman Company began the strike in response to the reduction in wages. Up to this point the workers had not formed a union. For this reason, Debs took the organizers of the ARU (American Railway Union) to the factory and tried to negotiate with the company. He did not accept any reason for negotiation for which ARU called a strike and began a boycott against the trains that transported the cars of the aforementioned factory.

The federal government tried to stop them with a court order they obtained, but the strike did not stop. In response to this, President Grover Cleveland ordered the Army to prevent the strikers from obstructing the trains, and later it was disbanded.

Debs was summoned to court for contempt. In the case In re Debs, it was discussed whether the federal government had the power to grant the court order that dealt with both interstate commerce and the interior of the state and the dispatch of the railroads. It was concluded that the government of the United States has the right to regulate interstate commerce and guarantee the operations of the Postal Service, in addition to guaranteeing the public welfare.

a historian researching the immigration policies of the early 1900s would expect a source written today,rather than in 1910 to :

( a ) be more interested in objective data and statistics.

jewish people, gypsies, and political opponents.