Considering the historian's use of source material, which interpretation is most valid? a. a historian uses an unidentified political cartoon published in japan after world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the war's effect on the japanese economy b. a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy c. a historian cites a 2015 blog post by a japanese teenager in order to draw conclusions about japan's economy after world war ii d. a historian uses a book written by japanese world war ii fighter pilot in order to draw conclusions about the war's effect on the japanese economy

B. A historian cites a Japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of World War II in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the Japanese economy

Explanation:

In this case, the historian is actually alluding to a historical source. A Newspaper is also a source of information and it is much more reliable than a random cartoon, a blog post, or an unreliable personal opinion.

From the newspaper, the historian can most likely check opinions from different journalists and the many different things that specialists were saying about the economy of the country back then.

hold on ill go look

john locke is most associated with the idea of consent of the governed which is the idea that the government is only valid if it has the consent of the people who are being governed.

hope this