How did the concept of imperialism contribute to the genocide of the armenian people during world war 1 a. it made the ottoman leaders suspicious of groups that were not turkish or muslim b. it resulted in the ottoman empire ruling over groups with different ethnicities and religions. c. it justified violence against any group perceived as unsupportive of the ottoman war effort. d. it gave the ottoman empire access to modern weapons that were extremely deadly.

C. It justified violence against any group perceived as unsupportive of the Ottoman war effort.

Explanation:

Imperialism which based on the expansion of territories leead to the world war 1 .This resulted in countries expanding their territory, industries, land ,and military.

However the Ottoman believed that the Armanian were surporting the Rusians ruringt he World War 1. This lead to the killings and massacre of millions of Christians

answer:   migrations were important in the neolithic period. "two major migrations passing through southeastern europe were confirmed by the means of archaeo-genetic studies."

the first migration was the early neolithic period -- 6,000 before common era (bce) -- when the first farmers, from anatolia -- asia minor -- spread through europe. the second migration occurred during the early bronze age (3,000-2,500 bce) when the so-called "steppe population," from the eurasian steppe, replaced much of northern europe's previous population.

the first farmers of northern and western europe passed through southeastern europe with limited hunter-gatherer genetic admixture, which occurs when two or more previously isolated populations begin interbreeding. however, some groups that remained mixed extensively -- without the male-biased, hunter-gatherer admixture that prevailed later in the north and west, according to latest discoveries. southeastern europe continued to be a nexus between east and west, with intermittent genetic contact with the steppe people up to 2,000 years before the migrations that replaced much of northern europe's population.

"in some places, hunter-gatherers and incoming farmers seem to have mixed very quickly," says iain mathieson, a geneticist at the university of pennsylvania, who was first author of the paper. "but, mostly, the two groups remained isolated, at least for the first few hundred years. these hunter-gatherers had been living there for thousands of years, and it must have been quite a shock to have these new people show up -- with a completely different lifestyle and appearance."