Based on “on women’s right to vote,” which answer best describes how events in susan b. anthony’s life contributed to her writing? on women’s right to vote anthony was arrested for trying to vote, which reinforced her belief that all citizens should have the vote. anthony witnessed african americans fighting for the right to vote, which inspired her idea that women should vote, too. anthony read the constitution, which led her to argue for women’s right to vote. anthony felt oppressed in her household, which led her to write about political independence.

Explanation:

Suffragette, abolitionist, educational reform activist, labor Susan Brownell Anthony was born on February 15, 1820 in Adams, Massachusetts, and died on March 13, 1906. She was the daughter of Daniel Anthony, an austere Quaker man. Anglo-Saxon Christian), abolitionist, owner of a cotton treatment plant, and Lucy Anthony. Susan was the second eldest daughter of eight children, learning to read and write at the age of three, demonstrating her precocity.

Susan B. Anthony had already read the American Constitution and knew that nothing under the law prohibited women from voting, from that reading she decided to fight for the release of the female vote because she thought it was extremely important that women also chose In addition, she believed that the vote was a way of reaffirming that men and women are equal before society and should have the same rights.  

Because of this belief Susan B Antony tried to register her vote in the 1872 presidential election, was arrested shortly thereafter and put on trial that confirmed that she should pay $ 100 for her crime. She never paid and stated, "I will never pay a $ 1 for an unfair penalty."

pacal the great: the throne was passed on to pacal through a female; as a result, he believed that he must legitimize his claim to the throne to add stability to his reign.

as a result, the daughter of ac kan's brother ruled until her son, pacal, reached an age old enough to assume the throne.

pacal the great became the king of the mayan city of palenque in a different way than most mayan kings.

pacal pointed out that ac kan had succeeded his mother as ruler, thereby establishing a precedent for the rule to pass through a female.  

he tried to justify that the way he gained the throne by connecting his mother with the divine mother and the mythological events that happened during the creation of the world.  

typically, the son of a male mayan ruler inherited the throne, but in 612 ce, king ac kan died and did not leave behind a male heir.

montezuma 1: even so, these wars of conquest failed to provide enough human sacrifices and because of this, he formed a triple alliance with cities in the valley of puebla-tlascala.  

in addition, montezuma realized that his government failed to the aztecs during the famine.

in order to appease him, montezuma increased the number of human sacrifices.

the aztec performed human sacrifices to their god huitzilopotchli because they believed he desired human blood.  

around 1440 ce, montezuma i became the fifth emperor of the aztecs and went on to rule for 28 years.  

soon after he assumed the throne, the aztecs were hit with a series of disasters, namely a plague of locusts, a flood, and a harsh frost  

huayna capac: huayna capac also fought to gain territories north of his empire in what is now ecuador.  

huayna capac significantly extended the inca empire to the south, into what is now argentina and chile.  

in 1493 ce, huayna capac became the eleventh ruler of the inca empire.  

huayna, therefore, wanted to gain his own lands and launched campaigns against tribes to the east and north of the empire.  

the inca empire reached its peak under the rule of huayna capac.

during this time the empire covered a vast territory including parts of present day colombia, peru, argentina, chile, bolivia, and ecuador.

during his reign, huayna heard about bearded men with pale skin that resembled the incan1 god viracocha and took this news as a bad omen.

huayna took this as another bad omen that predicted the destruction of the empire.

the correct answer is “opportunity cost”. opportunity cost is what a company misses out because it decided in one option over another one. in this case, the company decided to invest in building a factory so it gave up another possible benefit or profit in order to achieve success with the factory.  

trade-off is not the correct answer since it is a situation in which you accept losing something in return for benefits in other areas.

and finally, consequence is a general term used to accept what it comes when you make a decision. it can be a positive or negative consequence depending if the decision you took was the correct one.