In the photo the sign being displayed reads, “mr. president, how long must women wait for liberty? ” the protesters were standing in front of the white house. do you think this was a good way for women to fight for the vote? why or why not?

It was a way for them to get a word out there yes. But there isn't anything really that was done to make the government consider liberty for women. They could have used symbolism such as reenactments of different events or an event that could be changed or would have been changed if women could have voted or could vote. Along with that, several chants and signs with partitions signed by several known people and other citizens. That would have been a better demonstration.

though africans landed with few possessions, they carried their cultures, skills, and spiritual worldviews into the americas. wherever african religions took root in the new world, africans and their descendants changed and adapted their belief systems to local circumstances and influences. individual circumstances created variations in the way people practiced their faiths, what they believed, and what significance it held for their lives.

explanation:

mark brainliest!

hello!

according to the passage the most suitable options are two. the first one is "by leading the aef to victory in several key battles" like the battle of saint- mihiel and the battle of cantigny mentioned in the passage you copied here. the second one is "by the aef and allied forces defeat germany" since the passage says that his army destroy the german resistance in the meuse- argonne offensive. and also, "by insisting that the aef operate as an independent force".

hope this