Since the late 1970s, china has experienced many economic changes but few social changes. do you agree with this statement? why or why not? provide reasons for your answer in one paragraph.

In the past four decades, China has experienced several economic and social changes, their economy has developed and basically boomed, especially since the early XXI century. An example of this is their "reform and opening up" policy, starting in the late 70's, they decollectivized their agriculture and opened the country to foreing investment.

The country has experienced some social change as well, due to the prosperity the economy has brought, but compared to the economic changes, the social change has been small. Chinese society still has serious issues like information censorship, human rights violations or lack of enviromental care.  

PLATO ANSWER:

I agree with the statement. Since Deng Xiaoping’s leadership in China, there have been many economic reforms in the People’s Republic. As a result, more job opportunities have been generated, China has attracted foreign business, and the quality of life has improved for many Chinese citizens. However, the fight for democracy and better human rights in China still continues. So, although the economy is strong, I don’t think that China has focused enough on bringing about social changes in the country.

to it’s stable government, it has been able to accept refugees from somalia and south sudan. (apex)

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: