Pl answer with the correct answer no guessing plzzz compare the main ideas of the republic in modern-day united states to the monarchy of ancient babylon. how are laws made and enforced in each? who is in charge? how are the rights of citizens protected? talk about similarities and differences.

Comprarison between the republic of the United States and the monarchy of Babylon:

Difefrences:

- The monarchy was dominated by a king.

- The gods were those who dictated the laws to men, therefore, the laws were sacred.

- The babylonians had a complete legal code, applied throughout the empire. The law was written in stone.

- The code does not distinguish between civil and criminal law, that is, there are laws that regulate the affairs of everyday life and laws that punish crimes.

- The law was not the same for everyone. The same crime had a different punishment depending on who was the one who had committed it and against whom it was committed

- The punishments of babylonian law included fines, beatings, mutilations and executions.

- The absolute monarch directs and controls the three branches of the state

- In a republic three powers are independent.

- The people hold power, but elect representatives to exercise it. Voters elect the president, members of congress and various officials state and local.

- Laws are imposed in a constitution that people must comply with, where in front of a jury they judge the person who broke the law.

- The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America

- The penalties imposed in the constitution include jail.

The similarities that present are that both are political regimes, or forms of goverment, and not types of state, that govern thair laws in favor of the people but in a different way.

d is the answer. leo should include the source.

in mcculloch v. maryland (1819) the supreme court ruled that congress had implied powers under the necessary and proper clause of article i, section 8 of the constitution to create the second bank of the united states and that the state of maryland lacked the power to tax the bank.

gibbons v. ogden, (1824), was a landmark decision in which the supreme court of the united states held that the power to regulate interstate commerce, granted to congress by the commerce clause of the united states constitution, encompassed the power to regulate navigation.