Why did shays rebelion upset political leaders and what did this rebelion convence the leaders they needed to do?

Shay's rebellion showed that the government under the Articles of Confederation is weak. It is weak because it was not strong enough (doesn't have own militia unlike the federalist governement) to reppel the insurgency (rebellion), and it was unable to enforce laws reasonably and effectively (like the oppressive taxation that took away farmers money/ land, which was the main cause of Shay's rebellion). It wound down in 1787 with the election of a more popular governor, an economic upswing, and the creation of the Constitution of the United States in Philadelphia.

most of the knowledge we have of the conflict comes from roman-jewish scholar titus flavius josephus, who first fought in the revolt against the romans, but was then kept by future emperor vespasian as a slave and interpreter.

louverture's prominent role in the haitian success over colonialism and slavery had earned him the admiration of friends and detractors alike.

explanation:

toussaint louverture began his military career as a leader of the 1791 slave rebellion in saint-domingue; he was by then a free man and a jacobin.