Under what circumstances would the protest of the students in tinker v. des moines be deemed unprotected speech? if their action had clearly threatened order and safety if their action had supported an unpopular opinion if their action had not been political if their action had promoted an artistic endeavor

The correct answer is A) If their action had clearly threatened order and safety.

The protest of the students in Tinker v. Des Moines would be deemed unprotected speech if their action had clearly threatened order and safety.

As the Tinker v. Des Moines protest did not represent a clearly threaten to order or safety for anyone, it was not considered unprotected speech.

The case Tinker v. Des Moines on student expression refers to the 13-year-old junior high school student Mary Beth Tinker. In December 1965 she and fellow students wore black armbands inside the school to protest against the war in Vietnam.

if their action had clearly threatened order and safety

they were unable to pay their debts

the east coast has nothing to do with the dust bowl, the dust bowl killed a full year's worth of crops in seconds, and with the dust on the land, the land would be worthless.   furthermore the farmers couldn't  get  out of their houses due to the dust so when the bank came to collect money, farmers couldn't  pay it

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!