Ihave 4 extended response history questions i need answered asap and you. : )
1. what powers did the rowlatt bills give to the british government?
2. why were the indians so upset about the passage of this bill.
3. what is the difference between satyagraha and hartal?
4. how do you think nehru felt about gandhi? give reasons for your answer.
if anyone knows the answers to these questions and could give them to me it would be greatly appreciated because history isn't one of my strong subjects. again, you so : )

It provided unlimited drawn-out emergency actions of prolonged detention, arrest with no trial or review from the judiciary during World War II.  This was due to activities from nationalist rebels who might engage in alleged conspiracies while the war was being waged.

Many Indians saw it as an abuse of power because they can arrested without a warrant.

Harthal refers to strikes in workplaces where the workplace is closed by striking employees. Satyagraha is non-violent protest which what Gandhi used. I means insistence of the truth.

Although Nehru and Gandhi were always together there were times when they were at odds with each other.  The Salt March was one example because Nehru had doubts but when he saw the potential of it, he changed his mind.  Another was when he demanded a complete separation from the British and this was rejected by Gandhi.

both are true, the congress does have the power to create banks, even if this power is not specifically described in the constitution, since there is nothing restricting it and there is power given to the congress to make "all laws which shall be necessary and proper". maryland was not allowed to tax a branch of the national bank operating there, and the supreme court decided that no state could. both of these topics were discussed in a decision of the mcculloch v. maryland case in 1819.