The supreme courts decisions in terry v. ohio (1967) and horton v. california (1990) both held that the police

Answer : May, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

Explanation : Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the warrant less seizure of evidence which is in plain view. whereas in Terry v. Ohio (1967), in which the Supreme Court held that there may be certain cases where, they can search individuals or seize their property without a warrant.

hes right^^^

Explanation:

follow me on ig at treceongotfanz

the answer is: must pay taxes on profits

since it is considered as a part of your income, profits from investments is eligible for tax payment.

the tax from your investment could be influenced by how long you decided to sell it. united states promotes keeping your investment for long term period. so, the tax rate for investments that you sell in less than one year is typically higher compared to investments that you sell in more than one year period.

this defines the ability for a flex item to grow if necessary. it accepts a unitless value that serves as a proportion. it dictates what amount of the available space inside the flex container the item should take up.

give brainlest