Who among the following exhibits political thinking when deciding to vote for adia, a black candidate nominated for an upcoming election? multiple choice mark, who decides to vote for adia because television channels predict that she is most likely to win the elections based on the results of opinion polls lorna, who decides to vote for adia after listening to her speech because she thinks adia is capable of bringing about positive changes in society liam, who decides to vote for adia because the rest of his family is voting for her mia, who decides to vote for adia because adia is the only female candidate to be nominated martha, who decides to vote for adia because martha is also african american

The correct answer is B) Lorna, who decides to vote for Adia after listening to her speech because she thinks Adia is capable of bringing about positive changes in society.

The student that exhibits political thinking when deciding to vote for Adia, a black candidate nominated for an upcoming election is Lorna, who decides to vote for Adia after listening to her speech because she thinks Adia is capable of bringing about positive changes in society.

Political thinking is the structured way of considering information to decide about a political situation based on facts, context, history, and possibilities to impact society.  Citizens must be aware that they need to be informed about the political situation in their community, the problems that affect them, possible solutions, and the people who can be the best politicians. If they don't they are not able to make informed decisions. That is why Lorna is exhibiting political thinking.

d is correct the right of the people to be drafted into the armed forces.

hope this let me know if it is right.

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.