Why are primary sources important when studying historical events? a. because they are a direct link to the events in history b. because we would know very little about major historical events without these sources c. because primary sources are the only way we can learn about the culture of a civilization d. because secondary sources are not reliable enough and can’t be trusted

A - Because they are a direct link to the events in history

Primary sources are sources that came from that time of history from the same location, time period, and era. For instance, journals from World War II from a French Military leader. These are direct links to that time in history and are the most accurate sources that are presented.

B is incorrect as even without these sources there are other methods to know about history such as secondary sources.

C is incorrect as primary sources are not the only way - again, secondary sources are a thing.

D is incorrect as secondary sources are reliable and can be trusted, but they just aren't as important and well, direct as primary sources.

Hope this helps!

Correct answer is:

A. because they are a direct link to the events in history

Just got it correct in Plato

it took two men to wrestle rome back from chaos and turn a republic into an empire. in the first century bc, rome was a republic. power lay in the hands of the senate, elected by roman citizens. but the senators were fighting for power between themselves.