What might be the result of supporting the brown party with soft or hard power?

There are many ways in which a party or a government can achieve its goals. These can be divided in various ways, but a way to classify them is by talking about soft and hard power. Soft power refers to the ability to attract and convince others through appeal. Hard power, on the other hand, refers to coercion, often through the use of weapons or other threats. The result of supporting the Brown power with soft power would be that it might result in a peaceful outcome. It could also help you achieve a longer lasting effect. On the other hand, supporting it with hard power would most likely lead to more violence and discontent.

judaism developed through the growth of a single nation of people

christianity developed through followers spreading the religion throughout the world.

explanation:

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.