What idea was the decision in griswold v. connecticut based upon? if the constitution forbids self-incrimination, husbands and wives should not be forced to testify against each other. the constitution cannot possibly include all rights, so judges can create new ones based on what the founders must have been thinking. if the constitution forbids unreasonable searches, there must be a reasonable right to privacy. the constitution does not meet everyone’s needs, so citizens can disregard laws when they think the government is violating their rights.

Answer;

C. The Constitution forbids unreasonable search and seizure.

Explanation;

-Griswold v. Connecticut represents a landmark case in the history of United States. It was about an individual’s access to contraception. The case dealt with a Connecticut law prohibiting people from the use of; any drug, medicinal article, or instrument for the purpose of prevention of contraception.

-The Supreme Court ruled that a state's ban on the use of contraceptives violated the right to marital privacy. The case concerned a Connecticut law that criminalized the encouragement or use of birth control.

sir thomas more, venerated in the catholic church as saint thomas more, was an english lawyer, social philosopher, author, statesman, and noted renaissance humanist. he was also a councillor to henry viii, and lord high chancellor of england from october 1529 to 16 may 1532.

explanation:

a trial judge has broad powers in his courtroom. the judge's decision is usually final for the duration of the trial, and the party's one special type of witness is an expert witness.