How might different historians develop different interpretations of the same evidence?

There are many reasons why different historians might develop different interpretations of the same evidence. One of the most common ones is due to bias. Some historians might have a biased view of history due to their own preconceptions and prejudices. This will influence their view of the evidence. Moreover, a historian can be influenced by his own time period, or his cultural background.

boundary is what it refers to hope this

explanation:

answer; i believe the best answer is (straight ticket); good luck