Maria was conducting research regarding the treatment of aids victims using stem cells. she found a source that was written recently and had been peer reviewed. unfortunately, she could not determine the author. which of the following is a correct decision and justification maria should make regarding the use of this source? maria should use the source. the author is unimportant. maria should use the source. it has been peer reviewed. maria should not use the source. the author is unknown. maria should not use the source. the reviewing of peers is unimportant.

maria should use the source. it has been peer reviewed.

explanation:

peer review is the assessment of work by at least one individuals with comparable skills as the makers of the work. in the scholarly world, insightful peer review is regularly used to decide a scholastic paper's appropriateness for production so maria should use the source as it has been peer reviewed   even she could not determine the author.

obviously, the latter.

i think it's the first one because doctors aren't the ones who get rid of the old needles. most of them time it's not even doctors who give you shots, it's nurses.