After being evaluated by his gastroenterologist, mr. jackson was sent to the hospital for a diagnostic . he is having several symptoms that indicate a potential gastrointestinal condition. as a result, he was admitted in observation. his symptoms include vomiting, weight loss, and dysphagia. the reveals that the patient has low-grade barrett’s esophagus, gerd with reflux esophagitis, and a non-obstructing hiatal hernia. patient was also incidentally diagnosed with crest syndrome (crst), which correlates with his complaint of dysphagia. after the procedure, the patient was noted to have several pvc’s on his ekg. these resolved shortly after the patient arrived in the recovery room. based on the results of the detailed history, detailed exam, and straight forward medical decision making, it was decided that the patient could be discharged home on the same day with instructions for a follow up office appointment in 2 days. code this scenario.

Explain which dri value would you use to make sure that the vitamin supplement that you use does not contain too much vitamin a

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

When a doctor suspects that a patient may have diabetes based on what symptoms?