What would be the result if local governments did not get involved in healthcare?

Everyone would die

Explanation:

I think more people would die because private hospitals are more expensive then government hospitals and some people wouldn't be able to afford the high prices which would lead to lots of deaths because of people being left untreated

Health Affairs

SUBSCRIBE/RENEWFOR AUTHORS

RESEARCH ARTICLE

HEALTH AFFAIRSVOL. 2, NO. 4

The Role of State and Local Government In Health

Drew E. Altman and Douglas H. Morgan

PUBLISHED:WINTER 1983Free Accesshttps://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2.4.7

ABOUT

SECTIONS

PERMISSIONS

ABSTRACT

PROLOGUE:

As a consequence of the taxpayer's revolt that began in California and spread across the country, sharp cutbacks in federal aid to subnational levels of government, and the economic recession, state and local governments are being forced to cope with dramatically reduced resources. Nevertheless, spending for health remains big business in state and local governments today. More than one of every six dollars states spend (16.9percent) are devoted to health, slightly more than the share of the federal budget devoted to health (13 percent). Local governments spend 7.8 percent of their overall expenditures for health purposes, a proportion roughly equal to that of transportation, public safety, and natural resources and more than spending for public welfare. Recognizing that resources are shrinking at a time when responsibilities are expanding, Drew Altman and Douglas Morgan have a particular interest as officers at The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in developing policy approaches to this difficult equation that spare the most vulnerable population segments of society. Altman, an assistant vice-president at the foundation, is a political scientist by training (Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology) and former health official in the Carter administration. Morgan, a senior program officer at the foundation who holds a master's degree in public administration from New York University, was formerly the City of Newark's director of public health. Two decades ago, Altman and Morgan would have been in the forefront of the Great Society, believing as they do in a strong central government. Now, realists that they are, Altman and Morgan are struggling, along with many others, to strike new balances, build new alliances, and make tough decisions in the face of limited resources. As they underscore, these judgments will involve incremental changes rather than fundamental funding reallocations or policy shifts. Despite the incremental nature of the shifts, though, it is unlikely that ever again will state and local governments be cast so easily as the adversaries of the poor—they now represent a vast resource to people without means.

by going smokefree, you could improve the well-being of your friends, family, coworkers, and even your pets. here’s how the cigarettes you smoke affect the people around you.