For this activity, you can either create a video or write a dialogue. Create a scene with some kind of conflict. It can be as simple as a disagreement among friends or a mistake with a meal ordered in a restaurant. Or choose your own scenario. Create two versions of the scenario, one using the techniques for good communication, such as assertive communication and I messaging, and another with less productive styles, like aggressive communication or passive communication. When you have completed both versions of the scene, explain how good communication can benefit health and poor communication can negatively impact it. You can do this in a brief monologue at the end of the video or a paragraph at the end of the written dialogue. If you create a video, make sure that the video and audio portions are clear. If you write out your script, make sure it’s free of grammatical errors. It should be formatted like a play so that it’s clear who is speaking. dont make the video do the written dialogue

Astructural difference between the trachea and esophagus that prevents the trachea from collapsing is the presence of: a) smooth muscle b) skeletal muscle c) respiratory cilia d) rings of cartilage

Hi i need comment on my homework or something to add. *argue for and against quantitative and qualitative techniques respectively. which ones would you lean towards when conducting an investigation and why?   quantitative techniques, usually presented through surveys, are more practical, take less time, and can design samples in which any person or household of the target audience has the same probability of participating. however, the questionnaires must be carefully written by highly trained professionals, in such a way that they do not contain ambiguous or biased questions, that they are easily understandable by any member of the sample, and that they contemplate all the objectives of the research. besides that they do not allow to deepen in the reason of the facts. qualitative techniques, on the other hand, are based on the observation of natural behaviors, discourses, open responses for the subsequent interpretation of meanings. studying reality in its natural context can be extremely useful to learn more about the phenomenon studied. however, more specialization is required, they are not applicable to statistics, so it is not possible to make measurements, it entails a higher cost per studied population (which is also reduced), whose results do not necessarily represent the general population. i believe that knowing the situation of the general population, through statistics is essential. in addition, because of the possibility of studying a much larger population in less time and with less amount of economic resources, i would lean towards quantitative research.

*psych* 1. discuss the major categories of abnormal behaviors as classified by the diagnostic and statistical manual (dsm) 2. identify the characteristics of the major categories of abnormal behavior.