Which of the following definitions best describes the term illiteracy? a. The lack of access to higher education
b. The lack of belief in a higher power
c. The loss of a local group’s cultural or religious identity
d. The inability to read or write
e. None of these

d. The inability to read or write

Explanation:

"Literacy" refers to the ability of a person to read or write/ to become educated. Therefore, illiteracy is the opposite. It refers to the inability of a person to read or write.

Choice a is not the best term for illiteracy because the person may have learned reading and writing already, yet due to some reasons (e.g. financial constraint), he cannot proceed to higher education.

Choice b is not the best term for illiteracy. A lack of belief in a higher power maybe associated to the term, "Atheism."

Choice c is not the best term for illiteracy because losing one's local group's cultural identity and religious identity has nothing to do with reading and writing.

the only other powers were germany russia and uk and they were too busy fighting each other wearing each other down   that the us was becoming strong and they were becoming weaker

hi there,

on december 11, 2001, china officially became the 143rd member of the

world trade organization (wto) in the culmination of a negotiation

process which began in 1986. economists have long been debating the

global effects of china's accession to the wto, and as china becomes

fully integrated into the organization over the next several years,

the accuracy of their predictions will be tested.

one of the biggest residual effects of china's entry to the wto,

according to economists, will be the relocation of manufacturing and

distribution centers to china. due to its cheap labor, cheap

industrial land, and educated workforce, china is an ideal production

centre for businesses based in outside countries. this will likely

result in a twofold impact – more jobs will be available in china,

while countries like india, which have historically offered cheap

labor, will suffer. taiwan and malaysia's technology industries are

already suffering as companies like dell computers move production to

china, and while foreign investment soars in china, other asian

countries suffer. in addition, mexico and the caribbean will lose

thousands of garment manufacturing jobs as the u.s. lifts restraints

on chinese textile imports.

while the impact on southeast asia may be negative, the western world

may benefit. while some suggest china's open borders will result in

increased competition and a decreased employment rate for the western

world, western countries will benefit from access to china's highly

developed electronics and industry sectors. with duties and quotas

slashed, and restrictions lifted, multinationals will benefit by

setting up distribution centers without the need for chinese

middlemen. in addition, it's expected that china will import massive

amounts of food products, machinery and vehicles from the u.s., japan,

hong kong, taiwan, singapore and south korea, thus providing

significant boosts to these countries' economies.

in conclusion, it seems that while western countries may benefit from

china's accession to the wto, there's the potential that asian and

south american countries may feel the pinch of free trade as china

moves to a global economy.