subject
Geography, 03.04.2020 03:50 chanahvanya

You throw a red stone into a river, you go and retrieve it, What does it come out as??

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Geography

image
Geography, 23.06.2019 01:00, arlettehl1011
What type of damages can you cause while driving
Answers: 1
image
Geography, 23.06.2019 18:30, lishalarrickougdzr
What was apartheid and how did it restrict the rights of non-whites?
Answers: 1
image
Geography, 24.06.2019 03:30, jamarstand
Which of the following are characteristics of the boers? select all that apply. distrustful of the british won the second anglo-boer war used enslaved africans lost land to great britain because gold was found allowed to keep their country
Answers: 3
image
Geography, 24.06.2019 15:00, caleb258
Ecologist: the scottish highlands were once the site of extensive forests, but these forests have mostly disappeared and been replaced by peat bogs. the common view is that the highlands’ deforestation was caused by human activity, especially agriculture. however, [agriculture began in the highlands less than 2,000 years ago]. peat bogs, which consist of compressed decayed vegetable matter, build up by only about one footper 1,000 years and, [throughout the highlands, remains of trees in peat bogs are almost all at depths great than four feet]. since climate changes that occurred between 7,000 and 4,000 years ago favored the development of peat bogs rather than the survival of forests, the deforestation was more likely the result of natural processes than of human activity. in the ecologist’s argument the two portions in [parenthesis] play which of the following roles? a. the first is evidence that has been used in support of a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is a finding that the ecologist uses to counter that evidence. b. the first is evidence that, in light of the evidence provided in the second, serves as grounds for the ecologist’s rejection of a certain position. c. the first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is evidence that has been used in support of that position. d. the first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second provides evidence in support of that rejection. e. the first is a position for which the ecologist argues; the second provides evidence to support that position.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
You throw a red stone into a river, you go and retrieve it, What does it come out as??...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Health, 19.11.2020 22:50
Konu
Mathematics, 19.11.2020 22:50