That station is moving! as you may ha gps and plate tectonics e as state earlier gps data really aided in our ability to understand plate movement. below are vectors showing the movement of each station. for those unfamiliar with vectors they represent wirection and magnitude for amount of movement. translating that into the figure below this mean the arrows reflect which way the station is moving and the length of the arrows reflect how fast ation is moving! as you may have noticed from the prior two problems where you calculate velocity rates (questions b2-3 and b1-2) these rates aren't the same. gps data (below) shows s frend is observable worldwide, with various regions moving much faster (over millions of "compared to others. this will lead to some interesting process because it means vamos s may 'overtake' others. as an example, if subduction exceeds extension you may see the one overtake the spreading ridge. an event like this has actually happened and way a we know the location of this as the san andreas fault in california! this data is from the unavco consortium in boulder, colorado itrf2008 velocity field 2 cmy 6. using the map above what would you infer to be the fate of the pacific plate eventually (if you're not sure where this plate is use the internet)? (5 pts.) 7. where on the e on the map is determining the overall movement of plate most difficult? which ntinental landmass presents the most difficulty in determining its plate motion? why? (7 pts.) 8. what are limitations of the way this map is displayed? what may be difficult to determine based on this map? (7 pts.)