How might bp have managed the deepwater horizon disaster differently to reduce its loss of reputation in the united states?

Explanation:

The major point, which negatively impact the BP's reputation was the CEO Tony Hayward's comportment , who was seen in sunglasses and cap sailing on his yacht off Britain's south coast a few days after the event.

People then has observed the careless person and so lost right from the starting their faith into Hayward. Also, his handling of the Gulf disaster was strewn with public relations gaffs.

When seen under the header Public relations: the second disaster, he became the public face of the enterprise.

An alternative to overcome this reputation loss is to put somebody into place who has more awareness and experience towards the media. So, BP should have engaged in a variety of CSR policies to mitigate the destruction of brand equity.

the wrong statement is - c. a desert had more biodiversity than a marsh.

the deserts are one of the places of the planet where there's the least biodiversity. the reasons for that are the climate and the lack of food sources, which hampers both the number of the species that can survive in it, and the number of the individuals in the species itself.

the marshes, on the other hand, are places where there's perfect conditions for lots of organisms to thrive. the temperature is moderate and nice, the amount of water and the food sources are on a high level, so there's an abundance of both plant and animal life in them.