subject
Geography, 03.12.2019 15:31 beelcypher

Josh has been living on the us border near the rio grande his entire life. he has been tracking one area of the river for about five years now. he has noticed that it now flows towards mexico instead of the united states. what is josh witnessing?

ansver
Answers: 3

Other questions on the subject: Geography

image
Geography, 22.06.2019 14:40, thezbell
Geologists know that potassium-40 decays to argon-40, with a half-life of 1.3 billion years. if an analysis of a feldspar crystal in a sample of granite shows that 75 percent of the potassium-40 atoms have decayed to form argon-40, what is the age of the granite
Answers: 2
image
Geography, 23.06.2019 01:00, cool8844
Agricultural practices in the united states nearly led to the extinction of the peregrine falcon during the 1950s and 60s.
Answers: 1
image
Geography, 24.06.2019 08:00, glawson2
After railroads, the next revolution of transportation came with the development of (a) automobile (b) telegraph (c) steam engine
Answers: 2
image
Geography, 24.06.2019 15:00, caleb258
Ecologist: the scottish highlands were once the site of extensive forests, but these forests have mostly disappeared and been replaced by peat bogs. the common view is that the highlands’ deforestation was caused by human activity, especially agriculture. however, [agriculture began in the highlands less than 2,000 years ago]. peat bogs, which consist of compressed decayed vegetable matter, build up by only about one footper 1,000 years and, [throughout the highlands, remains of trees in peat bogs are almost all at depths great than four feet]. since climate changes that occurred between 7,000 and 4,000 years ago favored the development of peat bogs rather than the survival of forests, the deforestation was more likely the result of natural processes than of human activity. in the ecologist’s argument the two portions in [parenthesis] play which of the following roles? a. the first is evidence that has been used in support of a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is a finding that the ecologist uses to counter that evidence. b. the first is evidence that, in light of the evidence provided in the second, serves as grounds for the ecologist’s rejection of a certain position. c. the first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second is evidence that has been used in support of that position. d. the first is a position that the ecologist rejects; the second provides evidence in support of that rejection. e. the first is a position for which the ecologist argues; the second provides evidence to support that position.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Josh has been living on the us border near the rio grande his entire life. he has been tracking one...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 20.08.2019 00:30