Which is innate, a dog's ability to bark or a dog's ability to obey commands?

A dogs' ability to bark is innate

Explanation:

The word "Innate" can be used to define that certain ability that had no beginning, while also meaning "something born with the individual." In other words, the word "Innate" refers to a skill that did not need training to be used, that is, that skill was born with the individual.

In the case of dogs, the ability to obey commands needs training so that the dog can obey everything without making mistakes. However, the dog is born knowing how to bark, not needing to be taught or trained. So we can say that barking is an innate ability of dogs.

ok so like i went to wiki and looked up the (constitution x new "hammystan")and it showed me the picture it highlights new hampshire and says first and second session and than it says that they hit up the u.s and was like "ey dude that paper u sent us was adopted it bro thx" xd syays it all on wiki/the pic

i dont really like reading so i guess other people might not like reading either so   imma put the answer in bold italics

in "people in peace, not profit and war" chrisholm uses inductive reasoning for her argument against defense spending by stating that the new administration, like most americans, wanted to invest in social objectives, so they must not want to prioritize defense spending. mr. nixon said "we can delay no longer in launching new approaches to the problem that beset them", but chrisholm points out that the programs were delayed anyways.