According to the article, how does birk and sanders's interpretation of the inferno allow the modern-day reader to identify with an ancient literary work?
a. they use conversational language common to everyday people, which shows the raw elements of evil.
b. they provide a book introduction that describes ancient traditions and experiences.
c. they weave dante's formal language into the modern translation when appropriate.
d. they use footnotes that define out-of-date terms or unknown historical characters.

how much wood did the woodchuck chuck since a wood chuck can chuck wood.

xd

btw woodchucks cant chuck wood.

brainliest ?

the correct answer is a "it describes nora and mrs. linde's relationship". opcions b and d are not related to the content of the passage in any way. option c could be appropiate but it does not fully capture the effect of the dialogue, while option a is quite appropiate, since the dialogue not only exemplifies the relationship between the characters, but it also captures the effect in the excerpt. we get to know that mrs linde bosses around and already knows nora.