1) water is something most of us take for granted. (2) if we need a cold drink or want to take a shower, water is there. (3) if we want to water our yards or wash the dishes, water is there. (4) for many parts of the world, however, this is not true. (5) water is not everywhere it's miles away. (6) to get water involves a long walk to and from the source. (7) traditionally it is the job of women and children to spend their days searching for water. (8) then, they gather it to bring back to their homes. (9) sadly, even after that water is found, only some of its clean and safe enough to drink. (10) a number of groups across the globe have spent decades people get better access to water. (11) one such organization is called water. org (12) it was started in 2009 by actor matt damon and gary white, the co-founder of water partners. (13) what have they accomplished so far which sentence is missing an apostrophe for a contraction?

Which of the following best explains why the author chose the compare-and-contrast structure for paragraph 2

Describe the term romanticism. how is it evident in the poems of the era? be sure to include information related to poems from at least two authors. support your response with evidence related to form, sound, structure, and other poetic elements.

What is darrow’s main argument and the claims he makes in this excerpt? a. darrow argues that even if the boys are horrible monsters, their deaths will not solve the problems of society; he claims that society wants the boys to be executed because people enjoy watching public executions. b. he argues that the people who should be held responsible for the crime are leopold’s and loeb’s parents since they neglected their sons; he claims that leopold and loeb were jealous of the boy they killed because he had expensive belongings they could not afford. c. darrow argues that the boys should not face the death penalty; he claims they both suffer from mental illnesses that make them unable to tell the difference between a dream and reality. d. he argues that leopold and loeb, particularly dickie loeb, should not be executed; he claims they were teenagers who didn’t have proper adult guidance, so they are not responsible for what they did.