subject
English, 27.07.2019 19:30 dameiranderson

An author claims that "athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to prison." the author provides the following reason as support: in 2013, the tv show sport-zone surveyed 2,000 athletes. 73 percent admitted knowing a teammate who took performance-enhancing drugs. huang kroll, spokesperson for the international olympic committee, was interviewed during the program. "using illegal substances to gain an advantage is a huge issue," he explained. "unless stronger laws are passed—laws that result in prison rather than suspension from competition—the problem will continue to grow." which choice best describes the reason the author provides? it is effective. it supports the claim clearly and logically. it is irrelevant. it discusses a fact that is off topic and does not support the claim. it is unreliable. it does not give any details to prove that the source can be trusted. it is unverified. it does not cite a source to show where the information was located.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: English

image
English, 21.06.2019 21:40, Felixthecat8241
My cat and my dog like best friends
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 01:00, roorootx
Which website most likely provides reliable information about climate change?
Answers: 2
image
English, 22.06.2019 05:00, lanamiami
What best explains why the character asagai is a symbol for heritage ?
Answers: 1
image
English, 22.06.2019 09:10, kennyg02
What are some motifs in anansi boys
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
An author claims that "athletes caught using performance-enhancing drugs should be sentenced to pris...

Questions in other subjects: