Which sentence from the article demonstrates a logical flaw? a) next time you’re tempted to plug in and tune out, remember my warning. b) people who have ear buds in their ears simply cannot hear danger approaching. c) i won’t even mention how distracting ear buds can be for a student in a classroom setting! d) people refuse to recognize the danger of ear buds because they simply love their ear buds too much to give them up.

A logical fallacy, or logical flaw is an error in reasoning that makes an argument invalid. They are also called fallacies.

In a broad sense, all logical fallacies are arguments in which a conclusion doesn't follow logically from what preceded it. Or that the conclusion is produced by an argument that is not based on a strong and logical basis.

For example the sentence:

D) People refuse to recognize the danger of ear buds because they simply love their ear buds too much to give them up.

Here, we reach the conclusion that “that people refuse to recognize the danger of ear buds” by the faulty premise “people love their ear buds too much”.

So, to give a final answer to this question, the sentence from the article that demonstrates a logical flaw is:

D) People refuse to recognize the danger of ear buds because they simply love their ear buds too much to give them up.

Because its premise is based on a personal opinion

its structered sequentially i think

the pronoun reference replaces a noun, but you have to make sure there's no room for confusion.

in the first sentence "her" could be referring to shely or to the sister. the answer there is "shelly called her sister and told her about the new baby."

in the second sentence "it" could be referring to the roof or the floor. the answer there is "since the roof leaks on the family room floor, we need to repair the roof."