Read this extract and determine whether this person was in favor or opposed of the future of british north america. give reasons for this position (in favor or opposed) extract: [and] the maritime provinces can [only] ever attain real in such a combination as is now proposed, [can] be seen by anybody in the least acquainted with the position they occupy relatively to each [w]here, i would ask can [opponents of joining the colonies] expect to find another nova scotian who would be content with a position if isolation so utterly fatal to [the colony's progress.. [to] as the atlantic frontage of british america, [it] may now look confidently forward?

what is the question.. you are more likely giving us something to read with no question

answer: j

explanation:

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

killed them

explanation: