In the next land we found were cyclopes,
giants, louts, without a law to bless them.
in ignorance leaving the fruitage of the earth in mystery
to the immortal gods, they neither plow
nor sow by hand, nor till the ground, though grain—
wild wheat and barley—grows untended, and
wine-grapes, in clusters, ripen in heaven's rain.
cyclopes have no muster and no meeting,
no consultation or old tribal ways,
but each one dwells in his own mountain cave
dealing out rough justice to wife and child,
indifferent to what the others do.

what inference can be made about the cyclopes?

they are hospitable and welcoming to visitors of their homes.

they are uncivilized creatures who are potentially dangerous.

they will band together against common enemies, if needed.

they value education and sophistication above everything else.

The inference that can be made about the Cyclopes is that:

They are uncivilized creatures who are potentially dangerous.

"without a law to bless them" / "dealing rough justice to wife and child"

The inference that can be made about the Cyclopes is that:

They are uncivilized creatures who are potentially dangerous.  

"without a law to bless them" / "dealing rough justice to wife and child"

its hard for me to see which word is supposed to be in bold. if i knew then i would be able to better.

normally working animals are domesticated and ruled by a master, a domesticator (tamer), to perform basic and important functions on a farm, for example. the value used in this context is animal labor in exchange for food. it is not so much a contrast to the story told by napoleon and the pigs, since the animals of that particular farm also performed functions on the farm through domestication. the only thing is that in this case, who rules them is a pig, also an animal, but very respected, to whom the other animals lent him submission. that's about a strong relationship of dependency between animal and owner.